Thanks for the mammories, Facebook

Sat,10 Jan 2009 15:00 GMT -4:00 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18116

- Breasts are for feeding babies.

How very RUDE !

Facebook thinks so, anyway.

The pic on the right shows TV hostess Tyra Banks getting a few How-To to tips in a video on breastfeeding.com.

Not that Banks is a mum. The baby is a pseudo-baby and Tyra is pseudo-feeding her/him/it.

Shouldn’t be allowed, damnit !!! What’s the world coming to ?!

We owe Facebook guy Mark Zuckerman a vote of thanks.

He’s banned images of mothers breast-feeding their babies from the social networking site.

Well done, Mark! Well done!

But wait.

“Yet another social media site has waded into the treacherous waters of deciding what is and isn’t obscene and ended up with egg on its face - or in this case, breast milk,” says Dan Tynan on Tynan on Tech, going on »»»

Last month Facebook decided that posting photos of babies sucking happily at their mothers’ bosoms were naughty, not nice, and banned them from the site. Boy was that a mistake.

Angry moms immediately formed a Facebook protest group that now boasts nearly 160,000 members. Sharon Kennedy Wynne of Tampabay.com’s Whoa, Momma! blog writes:

The first five days of the year, the group was getting 10,000 new members a day. That’s about the number of people who defiantly posted breastfeeding photos online that day. There was artwork of Mary nursing Jesus, of cows nursing their calves and lots of Mommas feeding their babies, Stephanie Knapp Muir, one of the organizers, told me. But she was peppered with complaints that many had their photos removed and a terse letter from Facebook warning them not to do it again or risk losing their membership to the site.

Other bloggers took up the call; Google “Facebook breastfeeding” and you’ll get more than 2 million hits. The ticked-off moms are building a mosaic of breastfeeding photos that organizers say will ultimately feature 100,000 images.

Personally, I’d rather tussle with a grizzly or a great white than with an angry mother of a newborn. And yet Facebook refuses to back down.

OK, I’ll just say it, because you expect it: What total boobs those people are. If Facebook had simply asked the moms to mark these pictures as private, or limit access to adult family members, this whole controversy could have been nipped in the bud. Now thousands of women are nursing a grudge against the service.

And yes, I am milking this topic for jokes. (Have I missed any?)

The bigger issue of course is Net censorship. Trying to define obscenity is like trying to drive a nail through a bar of wet soap while wearing roller skates. Nobody wants Facebook to turn into a porn palace (except maybe the porn industry) but why it’s picking on lactating moms is a complete mystery. If watching a suckling babe in arms gets you all warm and wiggly, you have bigger problems.

And it will very likely backfire. Instead of Facebook banning moms, they might just decide to leave the service en masse. You might even call that offering tit for tat.

[This post originally appeared on Infoworld’s Notes From the Field blog.]

Dan Tynan - Tynan on Technology (beta)

[Tynan slugs his personal blog ‘Tech talk without the usual BS.’ He’s been writing and editing stories about technology and its discontents for more than 20 years. During that time he’s been an editor in chief and an executive editor for national magazines, written for more than 50 publications, and taken home a closet full of awards. He’s also the author of Computer Privacy Annoyances.]

var addthis_pub=" ";

January , 2009


Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php